For individual lessons across all four skills, visit the learning library, including Reading, Listening and vocabulary in context.
Learn from a revision
Compare two responses to the same original situation. Notice what is worth keeping and how specific changes make the response clearer.
AI-authored original examples; independent human teaching review is not yet verified. These are unrated learning examples, not official responses or predictions of your result.
Study help: S7 criteria and worked example
S7: Expressing an opinion — review guide
Develop a clear position with relevant reasons and examples.
Original learning criteria, not official rating descriptors or an assessment of your response. Use your own evidence before deciding what to revise.
State your position on the actual question, rather than only introducing the topic.
Support each reason with a concrete example or consequence.
If you mention a counterargument, explain how it affects your position instead of switching sides without explanation.
Connect evidence to a revision
Ideas and organization
The listener can follow a clear main message supported by relevant details.
Find evidence: Find the sentence that states your main message and the detail that makes it concrete.
Try a revision: Reorder or add a detail so the listener does not have to guess how it supports your message.
Vocabulary
Words describe the situation accurately and communicate the intended meaning.
Find evidence: Choose one general word in your transcript and identify the precise person, action or quality it refers to.
Try a revision: Try a more specific phrase, then say the sentence naturally rather than memorizing unfamiliar wording.
Listenability
A listener can hear the words and follow the phrasing without avoidable effort.
Find evidence: Replay your own recording and note the time of a phrase that is difficult to follow. Text alone cannot establish pronunciation, pauses or intonation.
Try a revision: Record that phrase again, grouping words by meaning and making the important words clear; compare the two recordings yourself.
Task fulfillment
The response serves the requested purpose, audience and situation.
Find evidence: Match what you said to each instruction, using the recording or transcript rather than your intended answer.
Try a revision: Add or adjust the missing communicative action, then practise within the task's response window.
The audio reads these original texts using a synthetic voice. Compare the wording and organization; these clips are not human performances or ratings of pronunciation, fluency or test level.
Example task
Do you think apartment buildings should provide a shared tool cupboard? Explain your opinion with reasons and an example.
Situation and reference facts
Consider both occasional access and responsibility for shared tools.
There is no single required opinion.
Needs revision
Yes, buildings should have tools. It is good for everyone. People need tools and tools are useful. There are no problems because sharing is good. I agree with the idea very much.
Listen to the response needing revision
Synthetic neural voice reading this original example. This is not a human performance, an official sample or a rated delivery model. Listen for how the ideas connect; a fluent synthetic reading does not establish the response’s proficiency level.
Revised response
I think a shared tool cupboard would be useful if the building also sets clear borrowing rules. Many residents need a drill or a small toolkit only a few times a year. For example, someone putting up a shelf could borrow a drill for the afternoon instead of buying one that then takes up space in a cupboard. However, shared equipment needs care. I would ask residents to record what they borrow and report damage before the next person uses it. The building should also keep instructions with each tool and decide who checks returns. With those arrangements, sharing could reduce unnecessary purchases without leaving responsibility unclear.
Listen to the revised response
Synthetic neural voice reading this original example. This is not a human performance, an official sample or a rated delivery model. Listen for how the ideas connect; a fluent synthetic reading does not establish the response’s proficiency level.
Keep this strength
Yes, buildings should have tools.
The original states an opinion clearly; stronger support can be added without changing the position.
What changed and why
Add useful detail
Before
tools are useful
After
someone putting up a shelf could borrow a drill for the afternoon
A practical example explains a particular benefit instead of restating usefulness.
Try it: After giving a reason, add a short example that demonstrates it.
Support your claims
Before
There are no problems
After
shared equipment needs care
Acknowledging a foreseeable limitation makes room for a useful safeguard.
Try it: Identify one likely problem and explain how your preferred policy would handle it.
Check your own response: Would your example still support the reason if the final sentence were removed?
Study collection: original-contrasts-v1. These examples use their own situations and are not model answers to a saved test attempt.
